Why MEN Kick Women's Azzes!
Our Founding Fathers (note: not Mothers - when did they ever found a country?) believed that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal."
Modern feminists have debated this claim, proposing that women were somehow mistakenly omitted and in fact, equal to Men as well. Although they presented no evidence, Men humored them to stop their constant nagging.
But, let's examine the evidence briefly, shall we?
MENTAL: Our intellectual, medical, scientific and technological advancements throughout the history of mankind have been propelled and innovated largely by Men. Men average 4-8 IQ points higher than women. There are twice as many men as women with an IQ of 120+. Most of our inventive and abstract geniuses (Tesla, Bohr, Nakamatsu, the notoriously inventive Chinese, etc) have all come fully-equipped with IQ-boosting bait & tackle. Who the hell invented the computers and internet we're all on RIGHT NOW???
Credit --> Men.
PHYSICAL: Athletics are so dominated by men that they must be segregated. Men are naturally born larger and stronger. Hence, Men simply beat women in everything from boxing to track & field to figure skating. Harder, faster, higher, farther, trickier, sicker... Anything a woman can do here...a Man can do better.
Credit --> Men.
PROTECTION/SECURITY: Men have served as the cannon-fodder to defend women, children and turf for millenia now. When push comes to shove, women stay back while Men step up to the front lines en masse.
Credit --> Men.
EXPLORATION: When it comes to thinking and stepping outside the known box - Men bravely set out where women fear to tread. To go where no woman has gone before. Has there ever been a woman on the moon? No. Men discovered the known world, while women slowly followed behind in our footsteps.
Credit --> Men.
ARTS: Men are the creative force of humanity. The field of arts, music and comedy has always been dominated by Men - from Paganini to Hendrix to Tupac. The great Greek sculptors, painters, etc. Even all the top chefs in the culinary arts are Men! When was the last time a woman really ROCKED or a comic killed...EVER?
Credit --> Men.
SPIRITUAL: Well, most every spiritual system has been founded by a Man - as well as most of the highest adepts. And let's not forget that Yahweh in the Bible, as well as Jesus, were both "he's."
Credit --> Men.
SEX: Men can pee standing up and don't get periods or PIDs. Our STD rates are only about a third that of women's. And we also rarely ever have problems orgasming. :P
Credit --> Men.
Men: 6
Women: 0
You look at most of the greatest humans in history, and the ONE common denominator has generally been that they were all MEN!
Now, what have feminists done besides bych, moan and decimate families and society? If they were another species - surely there'd be no question that they were inferior? If it weren't for Men, where would women be today? Still sitting in caves eating their toejam gossiping about the latest cavewh0re? Certainly not sitting comfortably in an air-conditioned building powered by AC electricity typing misandrist hate speech on a computer over the internet...all invented by MEN!If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts. - Camille PagliaLet's face it, fellas - WE KICK AZZ!!!! Men are the creative, penetrating force and builders of society. Under our guidance, society builds and technology progresses. Under women's guidance, both regress into chaotic Dark Ages. Yet, feminists so easily forget that.
But knock down the strong legs supporting your tabletop...and you will fall down EVEN HARDER... It was with our brains, backs and blood that you now sit in your ivory towers to ungratefully scapegoat and condemn us from. When in reality, Men are nothing less than a LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM for women! So, QUIT BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU, BYCHES!
posted by byrdeye at 9:54 AM
Stumble It!
34 Comments:
....waiting patiently until parthenogenesis becomes a reality, and then we'll see who the real winners are. I would be angry too if I was slowly becoming obsolete. Word to the wise: There are more of us than there are of you...
Normally I would not even dignify this kind of post with a response, but this is just too priceless to ignore…
“MENTAL: Our intellectual, medical, scientific and technological advancements throughout the history of mankind have been propelled and innovated largely by Men. Men average 4-8 IQ points higher than women. There are twice as many men as women with an IQ of 120+. Most of our inventive and abstract geniuses (Tesla, Bohr, Nakamatsu, the notoriously inventive Chinese, etc) have all come fully-equipped with IQ-boosting bait & tackle. Who the hell invented the computers and internet we're all on RIGHT NOW???
Credit --> Men.”
Ah yes, judged by tests which are horribly out of date and writen by men. Females often have higher grades in school and perform better than men in essay type tests (as used on college/grad school applications) and on tests such as the SAT & ACT
”PHYSICAL: Athletics are so dominated by men that they must be segregated. Men are naturally born larger and stronger. Hence, Men simply beat women in everything from boxing to track & field to figure skating. Harder, faster, higher, farther, trickier, sicker... Anything a woman can do here...a Man can do better.
Credit --> Men.”
Yes, men are generally larger and stronger, so naturally they will be faster, jump higher, and hit harder. However, in sports such as ice skating, dance, gymnastics, diving…well, women have superior flexibility and a higher level of grace which is why in such sports women dominate the air time, publicity, and the very sports themselves. Can men do a true split or land a double back flip on a balance beam? Can they do a perfect layback spin or a perfect flip in the pike position? No, by in large, they cannot. There are also plenty of sports where men and women can and do compete together often, such as pairs skating, target shooting, pool and archery.
”PROTECTION/SECURITY: Men have served as the cannon-fodder to defend women, children and turf for millenia now. When push comes to shove, women stay back while Men step up to the front lines en masse.
Credit --> Men.”
There are plenty of women who are in the military, security agencies, and police forces…and there would be more if it was not only recently that these things were seen as okay for women to want to do. Your house gets invaded in the middle of the night? I seriously doubt if the cop shows up and saves your ass you will care if they are male or female, so long as they get the bad guy.
”EXPLORATION: When it comes to thinking and stepping outside the known box - Men bravely set out where women fear to tread. To go where no woman has gone before. Has there ever been a woman on the moon? No. Men discovered the known world, while women slowly followed behind in our footsteps.
Credit --> Men.”
Funny, the Soviets put a woman into space a loooong time ago, and the Israelies have tons of female pilots…the BEST deep sea free diver in the world is a woman…once again, women were not given the same opportunites or credit here that men were.
”ARTS: Men are the creative force of humanity. The field of arts, music and comedy has always been dominated by Men - from Paganini to Hendrix to Tupac. The great Greek sculptors, painters, etc. Even all the top chefs in the culinary arts are Men! When was the last time a woman really ROCKED or a comic killed...EVER?
Credit --> Men.”
Okay, now that is just funny. There are just as many women writers, poets, musicians, singers, actresses, dancers, artists as there are men. (check out ‘great names of russian ballet’, you will see there are far more women than men. Look at the best-seller’s list of the NY Times, plenty of female & male authors, the Billboard Hot 100 for music, plenty of women there too). As for women who rock? Joan Jett, Lita Ford, Siouxsie Sioux, Debora Harry, Courtney Love, Terry Nun, Tori Amos, and a lot of folks sure think Judy Tunuda, Janine Garaffalo and Sandra Oi are funny. And oh yeah, men in entertainment and the arts can be fat, ugly, disgusting human beings with poor hygine, drug habbits, and countless other examples of unsavory behaviors and still be respected for their talent or vision. For women, if they are “wild” or “not conventionally pretty” it is a hell of a lot harder for them to make it. No one told Elvis to lay off the booze and loose some weight, but you can bet Aretha Franklin took shit for her appearance.
”SPIRITUAL: Well, most every spiritual system has been founded by a Man - as well as most of the highest adepts. And let's not forget that Yahweh in the Bible, as well as Jesus, were both "he's."
Credit --> Men.”
No, most organized religions were founded by men. Spirituality is a whole different thing. The Native Americans, Celts, and yes, even the Vikings knew there was a place for both sexes in spirituality…wonder why paganism is making such a comeback? Because there is a place for both the male and female divine-complimenting and supporting eachother, in a variety of ways and roles.
”SEX: Men can pee standing up and don't get periods or PIDs. Our STD rates are only about a third that of women's. And we also rarely ever have problems orgasming. :P
Credit --> Men.”
Pissing standing up has nothing to do with sex. Oh, and women can piss standing up too. We get periods so the human race can continue on earth, or did you forget that? And you guys don’t manifest the symptoms of a lot of STD’s as easily as women do, but you certainly carry & transmit them just as well. And trust me, plenty of you do have issues orgasming (or doing it only once, after 30 seconds…no damn stamina. Just because you can get off does not mean you have any real skill at it- where as women are multi-orgasmic and can last far longer.)
”Men: 6
Women: 0”
Heh, bullshit!
”You look at most of the greatest humans in history, and the ONE common denominator has generally been that they were all MEN!”
You look at most of the worst people in history, they also have the common demominatior of being men as well. Yep, you have Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare, and Robert Jarvik, but you also get Adolf Hitler, Ted Bundy and Pol Pot. Please, take ALL your credit where it is due.
”Now, what have feminists done besides bych, moan and decimate families and society? If they were another species - surely there'd be no question that they were inferior? If it weren't for Men, where would women be today? Still sitting in caves eating their toejam gossiping about the latest cavewh0re? Certainly not sitting comfortably in an air-conditioned building powered by AC electricity typing misandrist hate speech on a computer over the internet...all invented by MEN!”
Good lord, as much as you bitch, I think you might actually be a woman! Inferior and different are two separate things, Byrd. You know, aside from the physical strength thing, I would put my brains, physical health/atleticism, annual gross income and home repair ability up against yours any day of the week. I could probably out cook &, clean you too. Heh, I can do a one arm push up, can you?
”Let's face it, fellas - WE KICK AZZ!!!! Men are the creative, penetrating force and builders of society. Under our guidance, society builds and technology progresses. Under women's guidance, both regress into chaotic Dark Ages. Yet, feminists so easily forget that.”
Hey, most guys do kick ass. I’ve no problem with men as a whole, nor most women as a whole. There is plenty of asskicking for all. As for the Dark Ages…well, historically, the onset of the Dark Ages was attributed to the fall of Rome, which was brought on by civil distress and outside invasion (you know, manly politics and wars). Alaric and his Germanic barbarian tribes got Rome but good…and thus, the onset of the Dark Ages, which were plauged by Religious intolerance, wars, sickness…and male rule.
”But knock down the strong legs supporting your tabletop...and you will fall down EVEN HARDER... It was with our brains, backs and blood that you now sit in your ivory towers to ungratefully scapegoat and condemn us from. When in reality, Men are nothing less than a LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM for women! So, QUIT BITING THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU, BYCHES!”
I support myself, Byrd, I work for a living. What I have, I got, no one handed it to me. We’re ALL apart of a life support system…so quit biting the hand that breeds you, whiner.
Please, look at the bullshit on your own shoes before you claim to smell it on other peoples.
....waiting patiently until parthenogenesis becomes a reality
Of course you are. You must wait for this technology to be developed...by MEN (in Tokyo at the moment) - because you are not smart enough to do it yourself.
LMAO. Stupid arrogant woman.
re - BS.
Boys still average higher on total SAT/ACT scores than girls.
Male athletes still beat female athletes in every one of those sports you mentioned. Because men simply have a higher strength/weight ratio - so a short guy will still be stronger than a girl the same height. A top male gymnast will blow any female gymnast...out of the gym.
The scary thing about women entering combat roles is that the bar has to be lowered for them and so they are often underqualified for their positions. Here is a case-in-point of this. F'N SCARY...when a bystander has to rescue the female cop who shows up!
Lol, MALE rocket scientists put dogs and chimps into space, too! The credit there goes to the engineers though, not the animal payload...
Joan Jett, Lita Ford & Sandra Who? Lmao...where is the female Jimi Hendrix, Led Zeppelin or SRV? You just proved my point with the ridiculous examples you cited!
Spiritual men creating roles for women...is not the same as women creating spirituality. I find most American women completely spiritually-ignorant until their mid-30s at earliest. They are too busy "Tara Connering" their youths away until then...
Women DO get more STDs, period - symptomatically or not. Re-read the stats. Men can consistently get off easier during sex than women - this is common knowledge.
Now, I will admit that men do tend to span farther extremes.
There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper. - Camille Paglia
And, you work for a living? Wow, you want a gold star? Point is though - you still work in a machine created by Men. We were the architects of the society you plug into. Your company was probably started by a male entrepreneur with his creative vision. The tools you use were probably largely created by Men. Your whole world was built by US.
So YES, far from being your "oppressors," Men are your LIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEM. Now, BOW DOWN and show some gratitude, bish!
“re - BS.
Boys still average higher on total SAT/ACT scores than girls.”
Then why are all you smart boys whining about how oppressive us mean, weak, stupid women are, hum?
“Male athletes still beat female athletes in every one of those sports you mentioned. Because men simply have a higher strength/weight ratio - so a short guy will still be stronger than a girl the same height. A top male gymnast will blow any female gymnast...out of the gym.”
They flip higher and faster, woohoo. In case you hadn’t noticed, I stated plainly that women are not as large and strong as men, thus they would not be as powerful. Sports (especially like gymnastics and skating) are not all about power and strength. Sure, a guy is going to rock the rings, but he certainly could not hack the balance beam…. different body types, different strengths.
“The scary thing about women entering combat roles is that the bar has to be lowered for them and so they are often underqualified for their positions. Here is a case-in-point of this. F'N SCARY...when a bystander has to rescue the female cop who shows up!”
One story, amazing. The Israelis and Russians have had women in their militaries and police forces for years, in both combat and support roles, and they seem to do just fine.
“Lol, MALE rocket scientists put dogs and chimps into space, too! The credit there goes to the engineers though, not the animal payload...”
‘Colonel-Engineer Valentina Vladimirovna Tereshkova (March 6, 1937- ) was a Soviet cosmonaut and the first woman in space. She was on the Vostok 5 mission which launched on June 16, 1963, and orbited the Earth 48 times. The flight lasted 2.95 days (=70.8 hours). During her space mission, Tereshkova's radio call name was "Chaika," which means "seagull" in Russian.
The Vostok 5 spacecraft was recovered on June 19, 1963, in the Soviet Union. Tereshkova had parachuted from the spacecraft after earth's atmospheric re-entry; she landed about 380 miles northeast of Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Valentina Tereshkova was given the title "Hero of the Soviet Union," received the Order of Lenin, and was honored with the United Nations Gold Medal of Peace.
Tereshkova had been an expert in parachuting and a factory worker before she wrote to the Soviet space program, volunteering her service. She and the other candidates to be in the first woman in space were given extensive testing and interviews (beginning in December 1961). Tereshkova and Tatyana Torchillova were chosen in May 1963, to train for the Vostok 6 flight. Tereshkova was the final choice.
On November 3, 1963, Tereshkova married another cosmonaut (Andrian Nikolayev, who also went into space). They had a daughter, Elena Andrionovna, who was born in 1964; Elena (now a doctor in Russia) was the first child born to parents who both went into space. Tereshkova went on to graduate from the Zhuykosky Air Force Engineering Academy in 1969, and in 1976, earned a degree in Technical Science.’
Pretty impressive for ‘an animal’…
“Joan Jett, Lita Ford & Sandra Who? Lmao...where is the female Jimi Hendrix, Led Zeppelin or SRV? You just proved my point with the ridiculous examples you cited!”
How about Aretha Franklin, Diana Ross, Janis Joplin and Mama Cass, then?
“Spiritual men creating roles for women...is not the same as women creating spirituality. I find most American women completely spiritually-ignorant until their mid-30s at earliest. They are too busy "Tara Connering" their youths away until then...”
Funny, most guys are hardly “deep and introspective” until they are in that age bracket as well…too busy chasing skirts. And seeing as NONE of us were around back then, hard to say who created what, isn't it?
“Women DO get more STDs, period - symptomatically or not. Re-read the stats. Men can consistently get off easier during sex than women - this is common knowledge.”
Maybe more women would get off if you guys had any idea what you were doing…
Now, I will admit that men do tend to span farther extremes.
There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper. - Camille Paglia
“And, you work for a living? Wow, you want a gold star? Point is though - you still work in a machine created by Men. We were the architects of the society you plug into. Your company was probably started by a male entrepreneur with his creative vision. The tools you use were probably largely created by Men. Your whole world was built by US.”
Nah, no gold star is necessary...Hah, no argument there, you guys definitely pay my bills…being a stripper and all. You definitely create the demand for my job, no question. However, the company I work for was founded and is run by a woman, and my “tools” were created by genetics. Oh, and a plastic surgeon…and I am grateful to him for it.
“So YES, far from being your "oppressors," Men are your LIFE-SUPPORT SYSTEM. Now, BOW DOWN and show some gratitude, bish!”
I don’t think I ever called you all “my oppressors”, kid. But you’re not my life support system either, and don’t hold your breath on that gratitude thing. And the word is ‘bitch’, if you are going to say it, just say it.
renegade,
Well, sometimes, sympathy and pity override better judgement. But Men should not make that mistake again with women. Cuz, the more you give them, the less they'll appreciate you and the more they'll want and use it against you...
They flip higher and faster, woohoo.
Um, in sports - higher and faster is the whole point of the game, hun. It's what separates the winners from the losers.
The only general physical advantage women have is greater flexibility.
Well, the Israelis and Russians have generally been fighting ragtag Arabs armed with rocks, lol. And, I'm not sure what % of the hard, frontline combat roles are really women...my guess is a tiny minority at most.
AGAIN, your female payload was trained largely by MEN in a spaceship and space program engineered almost completely by MEN. This is not even debateable.
I'm sorry, but Aretha Franklin, Diana Ross, Janis Joplin and Mama Cass are not worthy of mention besides musical geniuses like Jimi Hendrix or Mozart - nor would THEY claim to be. Girl, please. Most/all of musical scales, theory and genres were all invented by Men. AGAIN, NOT DEBATEABLE. Quit arguing out of ego and accept the FACTS.
No, it's not hard to say who created what spiritually when history gives us the names and stories.
Women are just not designed to get off as easily as Men - due to evolutionary biology. Quit blaming Men and learn to understand and accept Nature.
Lol, ok, you work for a tiddy bar founded by a woman...but live dollar-to-dollar off of the disposable income of Men. I rest my case.
Sorry, but your argument keeps getting weaker and weaker. Face it, I'm right and you're just grasping at straws... Give it up, nobody here is buying your shyt.
You know, you just CAN'T POLISH A TURD - cuz it doesn't work and just gets REAL MESSY. So QUIT TRYING!
Renegade Evolution:
Incidentally I just realised men also dominate evolution given that genetic mutations are far more frequent in the Y chromosome which is only passed down the male line... ironic considering your nick and comment eh?
Anyway posted this on your blog:
"Ah yes, judged by tests which are horribly out of date and writen by men."
As judged by number of inventions and geniuses. And I suppose by up to date you are refering to the feminized education system which marginalises those same potential inventors and geniuses. Good stuff.
"However, in sports such as ice skating, dance, gymnastics, diving…well, women have superior flexibility and a higher level of grace"
Point conceeded then! In sports that are judged on the same critera beauty pageants are judged by, women dominate. In the other 99.99% of sports, men dominate.
"I seriously doubt if the cop shows up and saves your ass you will care if they are male or female, so long as they get the bad guy."
Operative word 'if'. Heard of circular logic or begging the question there, genius?
Antiprincess: "it's appalling that he seems to think that women and children dance and sing with boundless carefree joy while the men are slogging through the blood and mud."
Congratulations on pointing out why chivalry is dead. Ungrateful women. Where in the past, men died before any women did, we'll now see who has superior athletic ability based on who outruns the enemy faster if we get zero credit. Titanic no more!!
"the Soviets put a woman into space a loooong time ago"
Operative word, 'put'. How are women going in the uh FORMER Soviet Union these days, after their so-called liberation in communism brought the country crashing down around them?
"the Israelies have tons of female pilots"
The crash rate of female pilots is 4x that for men:
http://christianparty.net/womenpilots.htm
Congratulations one mentioning one of the systemic indicators of discrimination against men:
http://christianparty.net/discmen.htm
Take a gold star and go die in a plane crash, Einstein.
"The Native Americans, Celts, and yes, even the Vikings knew there was a place for both sexes in spirituality"
Celts: Dagda King of the gods (Male)
Vikings: Odin King of the gods (Male)
Native Americans: Ravens and Coyotes... (crack: You know you want it)
"…wonder why paganism is making such a comeback? "
Feminism is the religion of feminists, with the female self the object of worship. This is in striking polarity to actual spiritual religions where an external entity is worshipped. No room for that with your egos. So no, seeing as feminists are the only people that claim this, I wasn't wondering.
"Oh, and women can piss standing up too."
Yeh if they want piss all over their pants. Or are you referring to the penis-envy-esque:
http://www.femalefreedom.ca/
FEMALE LIBERATION BASED AROUND HAVING A PENIS@!!!
"And trust me, plenty of you do have issues orgasming (or doing it only once, after 30 seconds…no damn stamina."
Ahahah, yes admit that men can hardly get it up around you.
"Good lord, as much as you bitch, I think you might actually be a woman!"
Glad we agree women bitch too much.
"Heh, I can do a one arm push up, can you?"
200 of 'em so ner.
"the onset of the Dark Ages was attributed to the fall of Rome, which was brought on by civil distress"
And the civil distress? Hmm? Decadent and demoralised workforce and military? higher taxes? large welfare state? REDUCED BIRTH RATE?
Now what are some of the primary consequences of feminism?
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
"I support myself, Byrd, I work for a living. What I have, I got, no one handed it to me."
Yes of course. Sex workers' income is in no way dependent on men.
"so quit biting the hand that breeds you, whiner."
I vote this ending comment of yours the funniest. Sounds like some sort of feminist stock response, but.. what's it mean?
I should not bite the hand that breeds me today lest it not breed me tommorrow? I get born again every day? Wow.
Are you referring to my dear mother? Seems I was also bred by this guy called my father. And my mother's a bitch. Haven't seen her in years. Is that biting the hand? Main consequence of that was I don't have to put up with her shit anymore.
If we are referring to feminists, well, they don't breed. Infact they kill what they breed. Sounds like biting their hand can only do me good.
Heh, you said you give it as good as you get it, so only fair if it works the other way around right?
*Wonders if this will get posted here or on byrd's site*
I'd suggest next time you find some massive women's rights violation to complain about while saying it is funny, try not to just reply with something highly amusing.
Like my porn star name?
I would put my brains, physical health/atleticism, annual gross income and home repair ability up against yours any day of the week. I could probably out cook &, clean you too. Heh, I can do a one arm push up, can you?
Lol, righttt...let's see, I am well within the top 1% IQ-wise. I haven't gotten sick in the last 2 years and am in a very healthy height/weight range. 1-arm push-ups are child's play...I have actually even done 1-arm pull-ups before - but have yet to meet any woman who could. I also have no problem cooking and keeping my pad clean by myself. I mean, let's not forget - the world's most accomplished cooks and chefs...are by and large all MEN, too. And most cleaning technologies (vacuums, etc) were also invented BY MEN.
Now, you might possibly beat me in gross income FOR NOW as stripping can be pretty lucrative (although my salary is well above the national average of $40K). OF COURSE, your career there is extremely short-term and dependant upon your youth. Past 30, you must retire whereas my income will keep increasing until my 60s.
In short, the only temporary advantages you have over me now are youthful beauty and flexibility. Once you hit 30 though, I pretty much become superior to you in most every metric.
Well, carpe diem then - it's not like you have a choice...
So, basically...while men are busy creating and building industry and society from the ground up...women use all that development as a stepping-stone and pulpit upon which to leech off men and denounce us as their "oppressors."
Oh, the ungrateful irony. That is TRULY DESPICABLE!!! Not only do we get no appreciative "thank you's," but actually spit at in the face! Our feeding hands are covered in bloody bite marks from these gnashing feminist wenches!
I say, "LET THEM STARVE, THEN!"
Bird: Great that you are keeping yourself in shape then, seriously, good for you. And the 1% IQ thing, well, I'd have to see proof as well...
I am already over 30, Bird, and still doing just fine in my chosen profession, thanks. I also believe in investing wisely, savings accounts, and planning for a future career. I can carpe diem now and later.
Actually, I asked a question over at the Fine Art regarding all of this madness here lately...the need for a constant reaffirmation of superiority...I am honestly curious. I don't disagree with you fellows on everything, but seriously, why the need to be better?
Ren - TY, I am a very responsible person. Which means health & wealth are top priorities to me. If you are the same way, congrats too.
And, I have never scored below the top 1% in standardized testing, ever. Both my IQ and SAT scores are well within the top 1%. As should be evident from my writings alone...
Now, why the "need" to be better?
There is a reactionary need to simply SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT after a generation of unchallenged, unscientific, misandrist feminist rhetoric. Rhetoric that grows increasingly extremist and ignorant - with women professing that they "don't need Men" and that they've suffered under our "patriarchal oppression" for 5000 years!
When IN FACT, as I've quite easily PROVEN, they were UPLIFTED by our merciful, protective & benevolent patriarchy for 5000 years!!! But when was the last time any feminist even ACKNOWLEDGED these contributions, much less GAVE THANKS, for them??? Never? Well, ISN'T IT ABOUT TIME, then??? Yea...YOU'RE WELCOME, BYCHES!
So, there is a NEED to base social ideology and policy upon hard TRUTH, not distortional 1-sided lies. Because a house built on sand cannot stand. And right now, our country is built on feminist SAND. Which explains why it is collapsing under the heavy weight of liberal "Jewishism."
From a purely academic standpoint, exposing the truth is its own justification. And while this blogpost was written in a playful tone & very slughtly tongue-in-cheek, as mamonaku187 said, there really is no hard evidence to the contrary, either.
Also, as Hungdong Helsing inferred here, women have forced us to be superior through sexual selection. The fact is, the more superior a Man is to a woman...and other Men, the more attractive she finds him. Thus, women want a Man taller, stronger, smarter, more powerful and far more masculine than she is. She won't settle for less (unless she has no other choice). She doesn't want an equal, much less an inferior. It is thus in our evolutionary hardwiring to seek alpha status or die. Women WANT Men to be superior to them just as much as we feel their expectations for that.
In simpler terms, if you beat a guy in arm-wrestling - would that be a turn-on or a turn-off?
"In simpler terms, if you beat a guy in arm-wrestling - would that be a turn-on or a turn-off? "
Honestly? It depends on what I want to do with him...
Been pondering a rant on alpha humans here lately, and I am not going to say I think the world without men in it would be better, because frankly, I think it would suck...but I am curious...
I am with a guy I consider to be a pretty alpha type male; tall, in good shape, athlete, smart, articulate, funny...all that good stuff...he could most certainly beat me arm wrestling. He has, in his past, dated some overall submissive women who were thrilled with the idea of being subserviant to him in all ways, staying home, tending house and making babies. He said those kinds of women bore the shit out of him and he is far more attracted to women who are strong, have opinions, are also athletic and outspoken and smart and better at various things than he is and will only deal with so much of his bullshit...an equal (if different) kind of girlfriend, a continual challenge rather than a quick victory who keeps him on his toes. Now, women of this variety-feminist or not- don't actually grow on trees...I guess I just don't see why it appears (I stress the word appears) that MRA's have it 'in' for these kinds of women.
Thoughts?
Well, he probably actually feels MORE dominant when he has to beat you, rather than you just willingly submitting to him.
Now, generally speaking, BOTH Men & women primally prefer male dominance (power) and female submission (cooperation). This is especially observable in codified hierarchies like the military, where women will NEVER date down in rank. Or in longstanding codified relationship metaphors like ballroom dancing - where Men are expected to take the gentle, but assertve, lead.
But like ballroom dancing, I don't think that either prefers an absolutely 100% dominant Man or a 100% submissive woman.
Because I don't think either gender really wants Men to order women around like mindless robots... That can become a tiresome burden for Men and obviously far too non-autonomous for women.
Perhaps Pareto's 80/20 principle is a more realistic compromise. Where the optimal ideals might be an 80% dom/20% sub Man and an 80% sub/20% dom woman.
Extremes and extremists simply generally don't fare too well in Nature. People naturally seek a compromising balance to combine the best of multiple worlds.
Many Men do this with their professional & personal lives, too. This might be another factor.
Like how many type-A CEOs burdened with huge responsibilities at work may like to sub to dominatrixes to momentarily relieve those burdens.
At the other extreme, many guys who feel like powerless peons overpowered and "screwed over" at work - may rape women to momentarily regain a sense of power & control.
In your case, perhaps your bf is a managerial or dominant professional type who gets tired of bossing wimps around at work - and wants more of a challenge and a break from that at home?
BTW, as far as the real type of women MRAs rant against - it's more the spoiled-rotten, cake-eating, irrational, irresponsible, deceitful, opportunistic daughters of feminism who want it all...but want to give nothing for it.
So, what are all these empowered "grrrl power" rangers really accomplishing in life for humanity? Besides getting piss-drunk a lot and STDs? Or whining about empowering women (only) more?
When I look at the people really working to better humanity and ALL of our's futures - most of them are Men! Look at this guy - researching and promoting the 200 mpg vapor carburetor! Something that will benefit ALL of us, not just Men! And yet, we are still the "oppressors" here?
I love how feminists have no qualms taking full BENEFITS from Men while only blaming us for everything wrong under the Sun!
See, Men promote better ideas...women promote THEMSELVES. What has N.O.W. done in the last 50 years for anyone OTHER than their own narrow self-agendas - often at the EXPENSE of others? When N.O.W. invents a 200 mpg carburetor - somebody let me know...
I don't kno why the woman who posted says men can't do true splits and ouble back flips. She is talking crap. I can do splits better than any woman in my martial arts class and have seen many men do similar or better acrobatic movements than women. As far as grace is concerned is more preference because all those foreign gymnast men probably aren't allowed to act that way
Oh and doing splits is bad for women who plan on having children.
Whatever the differences and there are plenty ,between men and womyn one thing is obvious Viz If womyn were up to- it they would not seek positive discrimination in every area of life to compete.
Men have been overgenerous (stupid) enough to let their nation state(s) hijack their human rights for selfish purposes -and technology will keep it so for a long time.
The vitri dish beckons ladeez...and it not like real love....(in UK)
While I do agree with most of what your saying, byrdeye, I do think things will balance out in the end. If men were truly the superior sex, then we would not have let things get this badly. Men are far superior compared to women in many areas, yes, but we also have greater weaknesses. It is our inherent chivalry and the ease by which we let women sexually manipulate us that has been our downfall these past few decades. Women are far better liars and manipulators than men, and they've been able to use this to "even out" their other disadvantages. Women don't need to do all the good stuff men have done, they could (and have) just manipulate men into doing the job for them. In this way, they reap the benefits without doing any of the work!
Wrt to the first commenter who is big on parthenogenesis, has he/she
considered:
(1) that ameiotic parthenogenesis, androgenesis and artificial wombs are just as possible?
(2) that since MEN have invented parthenogenesis, they might just use it to create more women who could perhaps then legitimately be OWNED as SLAVES? Parthenogenesis would thus be the realization of the mother of all feminist fears.
(3) that even in the rare event that women somehow completetly controlled the parthenogenesis kit'n'caboodle, this very process of mass producing women is proven to be biologically unstable i.e. foreign germs can wipe out entire parthenogenetically produced women?
The situation would be analagous to that of the Aztecs who were wiped out by influenza and malaria brought over by the Spaniards.
In response to the argument 'there are more of us than of you', let the example of the Aztecs serve as an omen.
Also, wrt female figure skating, the total number of women in the world who can do a quad is TWO. For men, it is a pretty much a standard requirement.
I love women that are FEMININE, but I despise feminists.
Parthenogenesis was invented by us. No men finds attractive a woman that pisses standing. And I won't go on, because I couldn't do better than you guys, defusing this bitches' self delusions.
Besides, "parthenogenesis"? How sick is that? That sick you are?!
Gotta say, posts like these really make one think...
and, really, are totally worth it just to see the feminazi-baters come out in droves....I love how the one girl is like "normally, I would not even DIGNIFY this with a RESPONSE, but BECAUSE YOUR WORDS ARE SO PRICELESS TO ME I CANNOT IGNORE THEM..."
And then proceeds to argue for post after post....
Yeah...rational logic is so "beneath" her that she can't help but try to emulate it....except that she really doesn't understand the Socratic method at all.
Of course I think a lot of it has to do with what you expect. Look for feminazis and you'll find them everywhere, focus on the worst of female foibles and they will haunt you always...
I happen to know some very sweet young women who would read this post and, maybe be a bit pouty at some points, but overall say "This guy is right..." without taking offense....
Definition of a woman in this case:
"I think of a man. Then I take away reason and accountability."
Actually, the first computer programmer was a WOMAN, Ada Lovelace.
The computer compiler was also invented by a WOMAN, Grace Hopper. There are a lot more female inventors than you realize, have a look at these links: http://archives.lincolndailynews.
com/2003/Apr/03/News_new/business.shtml
http://archives.lincolndailynews.
com/2003/Apr/10/News_new/business.shtml
http://inventors.about.com/library/
blwomeninventors.html
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/
episteme/ep4/ep4maric.htm
http://www.factmonster.com/
ipka/A0768070.htm
Achieving academic success is dependent upon the accumulation of knowledge. A large proponent of accumulating knowledge is desire. If you want to know something, you will be likely to go to the effort of finding information on it and summarising it. If you don't care about the way something, then you're more likely to avoid it and never think about it again.
The current education system is a) pro-feminist and b) anti-male. Therefore, girls and women are more likely than boys and men to be feel the desire of accumulating knowledge via a formal education.
Does this mean women are more intelligent than men? NO!!!
Intellect is defined by Oxford Dictionary as 'the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively'. A website I saw a year or two ago defined intellect as the ability to analyse and interpret data from the outside world. Based on the aforementioned definitions, it is reasonable to argue that knowledge is not an indicator of intellect.
Invention is the best way to measure intellect. The practice of invention involves the ability to use reason and abstraction as a means of gathering an understanding of something that has yet to be understood. In other words, to invent, you need to be able to analyse and interpret information and looking between the gaps to find the answer -- as opposed to reading the answer from a textook.
Women seem to be pretty good at reading answers from textbooks and memorising them, but what are they like at understanding unknown concepts?
According to Buttons to Biotech report, over 90% of patents filed in the USA between 1977 and 1996 were filed by men. [1] Yet most University students in the USA are women, and have been this way since the early 1980's. [2]
Therefore, this shows that a) the accumulation of knowledge is a poor measurement of intellect and b) men as a class are more intelligent than women).
The moral of the story -- anyone can go to a University, but not everyone has the congnitive ability to invent.
[1]http://www.uspto.gov/go/taf/wom_98.pdf
[2]http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2003/0429sacks.html
as for the blogger waiting for "parthenogenesis (reproduction without sex) - I wonder which sex has done more in the area of reproduction science? And how will you feel if/when science finds a way to reproduce children without using a woman's womb ? Or even a woman's genes? With the X and Y chromosomes from men, presumably we could produce both sexes, with women's Xs we can only produce women, so we only need men in order to continue society as we know it. However I am sure most less bitter women would find a world with no men rather dull. When you think of it, also, isn;t it odd to hear feminists saying men will be "obsolete"if they are not needed for procreation - wouldn't it be deemed horrendously sexist to suggest women's only value is their usefulness in producing babies?
Much as i do like women and appreciate their huge contributions to society.. (TITS, useful for feeding KIDS.. Without which the human race would become extinct..)..
I have not met many clever ones.
Sadly, when I do encounter clever women, I find they are usually misdirected into male-hatred and manipulation, as a side effect of the state wishing to take advantage of their very "busy" nature..
Hence, they often forget to do what they are best suited for, breeding.. And those tits go to waste..
Shame really..
These blog postings do not conform to message standards developed by the U.S. Department of Feminism, academics, and media.
I qoute "....waiting patiently until parthenogenesis becomes a reality, and then we'll see who the real winners are. I would be angry too if I was slowly becoming obsolete. Word to the wise: There are more of us than there are of you...". Yes there are more wemon than men. However I would say that 4 women approximately equal an infinitesimal man, So you are Fucked! But on the bright side that would be nothing new to you. :-)
I'm not worried about the Feminists. It's good and fortuitous for decent men that they practice their beliefs. They will exclude themselves from the gene pool. This is not wishful thinking, this is absolute fact. The United States has two demographic groups that are growing rapidly. They are the Hispanic Americans and the Evangelicals. Neither culture adheres to Feminism. The Feminists may deny as much as they wish, but in less than 50 years America will look very differant. The racial makeup of the nation will dratically change as well. Get used to it. The US will once again shift in it's moral values towards a more conservative stance. It does not mean they will go Republican or become rabidly religious. It will mean that traditional gender roles will not be denigrated and may become more prominent. These are the roles that the past million years of evolution have hard coded into Humanity. For the record I don't care if a woman is more intelligent than I. I often tell my wife that she is more intelligent than I. Since we are in a marriage and not a competition I consider us to be on the same team. And yes, as a note to the Feminists, she is a beautiful Russian bride and a scientist who speaks three languages.
Agreed!
Sorry, but women leaders just don't cut the mustard
By Kevin Myers
KMYERS@INDEPENDENT.IE
Tuesday May 13 2008
The 'Sunday Times' columnist India Knight is one of the best things about her newspaper. She is usually careful and nuanced in her judgments, and seems to work to no particular agenda.
So I was rather taken by her surprise that women contestants in the reality TV show 'The Apprentice' (in which Sir Alan Sugar searches for successful business leaders) were either so bitchy and bullying, or weak and pliable. Ah, India, have you already forgotten what you once knew for sure in your all-girls' playground?
As a species, women do not form into hierarchies like men. Yet contrary to what many feminists think, the hierarchy is a fairly safe place to be, once you've established your place in it. That initial process can be bloody, but it is usually brief, and once men have learnt where they stand relative to one another, they can and do co-exist.
Women tend not to have hierarchies. Instead, they have the easy affability of a coffee morning, in which there seems to be unstructured social access to one another. But that lack of structure makes its participants unsure of themselves. It is why she-gangs form around certain strong individuals, and why the term "bitchiness" accurately describes how women often behave towards one other -- in precisely the same way that female dogs do: they are riven and driven by social insecurity.
The degree to which women dislike their friends never ceases to amaze me: they talk about one another in ways that men would only do about their sworn enemies, if even then. Men dislike; men hate; men kill.
But they do not bitch. And the companion to female bitching is exclusion, that deadly social tool which is the hallmark of the girls' society and which is almost non-existent among boys.
Take an enduring culture of criticism and of exclusion, and there is only one certain outcome: division. And divisiveness is one the great and defining characteristics of female institutions.
It is one of the great historical paradoxes that feminism swept the western world even as the proto-feminist movement, the all-female religious orders, were dying. They have been reduced in the popular mind to the caricature of the Magdalene laundries. Yet at their best, the great women's religious orders of Ireland were among the mightiest and most influential institutions in this country.On the other hand, why was there the "need" to found so many Irish orders of nuns?
Does the one true church -- as it saw itself -- need such localised female interpretations of its message?
After all, there are a handful Irish male foundations.
Otherwise, generally speaking, most Irish male religious orders are offshoots of existing mainland European ones: around a dozen, probably. The reverse is true for female orders.
The Dublin telephone directory lists over 70 orders of nuns: not convents, mind, but separate religious orders of nuns, mostly of foreign foundation. So, there are eight different orders dedicated to "charity" -- the Daughters of Charity, the Sisters of Charity, the Religious Sisters of Charity, the Sisters of Our Lady of Charity, the Sisters of Charity of Nevers, the Sisters of Charity of St Paul, the Daughters of Charity and the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul. All of which suggests there probably wasn't too much charity in the foundation of so many rival charities.
There are Daughters of the Cross, Handmaids of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, Faithful Companions of Jesus, Servants of the Holy Spirit, Little Sisters of the Poor and Poor Servants of the Mother of God.There are major orders like Holy Faith, with many houses, and tiny one likes Sisters of St Joseph of the Sacred Heart and Sisters of St Joseph of Peace, with but one each. And there are five different, and therefore effectively competing, orders dedicated to St Francis of Assisi.
There you have it, in its raw and natural state: female society when left to its own devices -- fissiparous and organisationally dysfunctional. So when people say, "How much better the world would be if it were ruled by women", well, nuns have already shown us how a female-governed world would be. It might be better -- but it certainly would not be collegiate, or consensual, or obedient or orderly, which are the qualities which result from the male hierarchy.To be sure, there are some women who can command the male hierarchy, and who function socially rather like men, Margaret Thatcher being the most spectacular example of recent decades.
But, generally speaking, women who have reached the political heights have done so through special dispensation cultures, as in Norway and Iceland, where the political stakes are so low that it really doesn't really matter who rules; or through family connections like Mrs Gandhi in India or Mrs Bandaranaike in Ceylon, or Hillary Clinton (God help us) in the US. For, generally speaking, women make poor leaders: and even the best seldom command both loyalty and obedience. So it's a sure a sign of the ideological power of the feminist heresy in the modern world that such an obvious truth should take even a wise and seasoned observer like India Knight so totally by surprise.
- KMYERS@INDEPENDENT.IE
Everytime someone in this argument has said: "Yet, feminists so easily forget that...." or "Feminists always go on about......".
I honestly facepalmed, followed by a long sigh. You can't just go around throwing massive generalisations around and expect to be taken seriously.
Feminists aren't one group of people.They have many and varied beliefs. Lumping them all together with one word is a bit naive in my opinion. Perhaps in future you could be more specific please.
Oh and Renegade Evolution, you kick ass. To the extent that I intend to base a character on you next time I start writing ^_^
I am a male feminist. My IQ/standardized test scoring is well within the top 1 percent. I say this, not to brag, but in the hopes that it may lend my comments any weight.
ByrdEye, your main point has some validity to it. It is true that many institutions which we tacitly accept as having always been present to the degree that we base our life and livelihood around them were created solely or largely by men. However, what your point fails to take into account in concluding that women should be thanking men for all that they have done for them is that perhaps, if society had been otherwise constructed, women would have been far more involved in the creation of said institutions. That is, it seems entirely plausible to me that the bases for the lack of women in the founding of these deeply necessary guiding bodies of thought and politic are the previously necessary guiding bodies of thought and politic which were patriarchal and hegemonic and unsurprisingly spawned more patriarchal and hegemonic societies.
As to the measurable difference between men and women, the only one truly pertinent to the point is in intelligence (who cares if men are stronger when what we're talking about is progress and invention). The use of IQ/standardized tests to determine aptitude for the purpose of our conversation is unreasonable. Standardized tests have been experimentally shown, over and over again, to be a greater measure of how the subject believes they should score rather than how smart they actually are. My favorite such experiment is the case (I forget the experimenters' names...) where a sufficiently large gathering of Asian-American women were gathered in a testing facility and asked to discuss stereotypes about their gender and then administered a mathematics proficiency test. Unsurprisingly, they did well below the gender unbiased average. Then they were asked to discuss the stereotypes about their race (mathematically gifted) and administered a test of comparable difficulty. They overwhelmingly did well above the norm, blowing the scores from their previous test out of the proverbial water. Conclusion: It seems probable that women do poorly on standardized tests because they are led to believe that they should. This same argument is simply a more concrete example of my general thought from above.
P.S. ByrdEye, in the future, if you have a point to make, simply make it. Leave out the expletives, or the near expletives, unless they are truly necessary. Saying to "BOW DOWN to us BYTCHES" is simply uncalled and not only detracts attention from your point, it also alienates your reader.
P.P.S. another great woman vocalist who truly rocks is Big Mama Thornton, whose songs were often covered by the powerhouse men of entertainment including Elvis Presley with "Hound Dog"
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home